Sunday, March 15, 2009
Tried and true, or alternative materials?
It's funny to me how surfers, who most like to think of as open-minded,
free-thinking folk, are often extremely close-minded when it comes
to alternative forms of surfboard construction and production.
What I'm talking about here is the steadfast commitment of some
to the old standard 'poly' surfboards along with their complete
degradation of other techniques such as 'sandwich' construction,
vacuum-bagging, EPS/epoxy, XTR/epoxy, etc.
Don't get me wrong...I've been plently happy with the resin-tinted,
gloss & polish 'poly' boards I've been getting of late and think many
simply prefer the feel of what they've grown up with and are used
to. I just think there are so many cool new forms of technology
in the surfboard industry that haven't quite caught on due to the
reluctance of many to try something new.
I read an article recently where Bill 'Stretch' Reidel (sp?) was quoted
praising Surftech's technology, and it made me think about how much
these 'popouts' are slammed by so-called purists. I've had 2 boards
in Surftech technology, and both were really fun, positive feeling boards.
I owned another board (Cobalt) in a similar technology that was one
of the funnest longboards I've ridden. While I understand (and agree
with) many arguments that surfers should support their local shapers,
I find it pretty ironic that just about every other product most of us
use while surfing is made elsewhere without so much as a whisper of the
contempt shown towards 'popout' surfboards.
I dunno...just something that strikes me as odd.
Needless to say, I'm plently happy with the 'poly' beauties I've been
getting from my local shaper. I think there should be a bit more
open-mindedness towards alternatives at the same time.
Just my $.02.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow.. cool blogpost, Keep Stoked buddy..
ReplyDelete